White Pines Software (WPNE), $ 6 1/2 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : White Pines Software (WPNE), $ 6 1/2

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (381)	4/10/2000 12:55:00 PM
From: AJ Berger	Read Replies (1) of 392

Alfred Poor killed us in PC Magazine 04/18 issue giving NetMeeting 3.01($0.00) from MicroSoft 4 out of 5 stars, and CU-SeeMe Pro 4.0.1($69.00) only 3 out of 5 stars. I wonder if the DOJ is including in their arguements that fact that MSFT bundels NetMeeting for free; in essense trying to stomp out yet another smaller innovator... sorry, pcmagazine.com does not post their magazine content for two weeks after publication, or i'd gladly provide a link. maybe someone on yahoo will just type the whole damn thing... Here's are the 'concluding' sentences... "Aside from the cost, most of the differences between the two programs come down to personal preference. For example, CU-SeeMe lets you have multiple video and audio streams open at once, so a multiparticipant meeting can have pictures and sound for all. NetMeeting supports only two participants for video and sound, unless a multipoint server (such as CU-SeeMe) hosts the meeting. NetMeeting does support multiple users for text chat, whiteboard functions, and applications sharing. We found that in simple two-participant connections using the same cameras under the same conditions, NetMeeting produced smoother video with better quality than CU-SeeMe. Unless you definitely need to see multiple participants on the screen at once, NetMeeting has the edge."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next