SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.
QCOM 174.01-0.3%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (1606)4/11/2000 10:31:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 12232
 
usvms.gpo.gov

Here are the "Conclusions of Law". By narrowly enough defining any market, there is obviously a monopoly. Indeed, by narrow-enough definition, every transaction is a transient monopoly.

10 gas stations on a street still leaves a monopoly if the 'selling of gasoline within 100 metres of a business' is the definition of the market.

Instead of defining the relevant monopoly as 'operating systems which run on a particular Intel chip' the definition, 'systems to manipulate bits and bytes' would more reasonably be used. Or even 'means of storage and communication of information'.

There is obviously no monopoly, even in the absurdly narrow context of Intel chips.

Sun and the other whiners need to forget their nonsense and get back to work.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News