SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 88.13+1.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (39783)4/13/2000 10:04:00 AM
From: Dave B  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Scumbria,

the Dell B Series 866Mhz system with 128M RDRAM turned in equivalent scores as 3 Athlon 1Ghz systems (2 with 256M SDRAM and 1 with 128M SDRAM).

Exactly my point. PIII performs better than Athlon, because PIII has an onboard L2 which provides lower memory latency. The key word here is "latency".


Now I'm confused. I thought your point was: "Faster CPUs will generally produce higher benchmark scores than slower CPUs, regardless of other system issues."

Regardless, my point is that it's more of a PR issue now. If benchmarks had shown that there was absolutely no benefit to the PIII/RDRAM combo, as many of the anti-RDRAM crowd claimed, then we'd be dead in the water. But they haven't -- in fact they appear to show a distinct advantage (especially the PC World results). Whether it's L2 cache or RDRAM or the 820 chipset is immaterial -- the average customer buys a "package" and the PIII/RDRAM "package" is looking good.

Hopefully, Rambus and the interested PC mfrs. will milk these results for all they can get.

Dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext