SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 88.13+1.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (39970)4/15/2000 1:55:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (2) of 93625
 
Scumbria, you get "faster" transistors in two ways, you reduce features (good for cost) and you increase threshold voltages (bad for heat dissipation) (and that a very "simplistic" description). I am not sure about DDR for the simple reason that not enough of these (and their associated chip sets) are out there. One thing, I would postulate, is that as speed increases, engineers will have to learn to perfection the religion of transmission lines, since at the 500 MHZ and above range, every parasitic capacitance, mismatched terminations, open lines etc will be a source of headaches (as we have learned from the third open connectors in the early 820 fiasco). I am sure that similar problems are going to crop up for DDR. Sure, DDR is a more evolutionary development (of SDRAM) when compared to RDRAM, but that is also its Achiles heel, it frequency extensions capabilities are limited just for that reason.

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext