Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 233.22

+1.8%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: re3 who wrote (101100)	4/15/2000 10:12:00 PM
From: Victor Lazlo	Read Replies (1) of 164684

It's idiotic because the guy is comparing apples and elephants. To compare the DOW's valuations from the 1920's 1930's, 1940's etc to the nasdaq, which really began in its present form in 1975, is idiotic. Since he was slamming the present nasdaq valuations, why did he not look at historical nasdaq ranges, and talk about that? Maybe he did at first, and decided it was not too out of whack with the last year's figures! When you get to appear in print, it's always best to be dramatic and hard-hitting, I suppose, even if you have to resort to comparing apples and elephants. After all, many readers just won't know any better. nasdaq.com I haven't heard anything about Stack in a long time, though- good to see a blast from the past.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next