SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Interdigital Communication(IDCC)
IDCC 354.74-4.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bux who wrote (4145)4/17/2000 6:27:00 PM
From: Gus  Read Replies (2) of 5195
 
I hesitate to get into a discussion with you, Buxie, after the masterful performance that you put up the last time when you tried to turn the 1994 cross-licensing agreement between IDC and QCOM into a 'giveaway of patents.' It was then that I realized that there was something mentally wrong with you. Of course, after you were embarrassed more than a few times here, you then proceeded to go nutso on the Raging Bull thread, posting over 100 posts a day and using your portfolio -- 80% still in QCOM, eh? LOL -- as a soapbox to among other things, a) preach to a former CEO of a major Wall Street brokerage house about investing; and, b) preach to the numerous patent lawyers there about the nuances of patent litigation without even knowing the most basic thing about Markman or Cybor vs Fastech, the controlling case law in patent litigation today that should give anyone pause when QCOM makes grandiose claims about 3G WCDMA. In other words, Buxie, I have you pegged as a nutcase so don't try to talk to me again because you don't have anything to say.

And your 80% QCOM portfolio isn't doing any good, either is it Bux, with your precious 3 million CDMAOne subscribers in Japan being moved to WCDMA and according to press reports, QCOM desperately trying to barge into the Japanese market using the US Trade Representative as its battering ram?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext