SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ScotMcI who wrote (24691)4/19/2000 12:37:00 PM
From: ScotMcI  Read Replies (3) of 25960
 
On the principle that everything's been posted,
but not everyone has posted it, I blatantly
swiped the following from the Yahoo Cymer board
(which apparently blatently swiped it from another
thread on SI). With thanks to SonOfMotherTrucker
for the reformat (which I then proceeded to
reformat too. ):

A rehash of a post submitted from the SI board
earlier by highstickr. I've fixed the table so
that it is readable and added the averages vs
Cymer at the bottom:

Below is a list of stats on stocks I and a few
friends own or have possible interest in -- many
of them are G/Ks so I thought I would share the
info. A quick explanation of PEG ratios to anyone
unfamiliar, how they're arrived at and the idea
is behind them...

PE/G stands for Price divided by Earnings Growth.
For example, let's look at Microsoft -- it closed
Friday at 74...the concensus of analysts on their
5-yr growth rate is 24.8%. So you divide the price
74 by 24.8% and come up with 1.77 -- that's their
PE/G ratio. (column 6)

Now a quick look at the S&P 500 -- analysts
estimate the SP500 will grow at 15.2% over the
next 5 yrs. The current PE ratio of the SP500
is 26.75 -- so if you divide 26.75 by 15.2 --
you get a PE/G ratio of 1.76 --

Now back to the Microsoft example -- if you
divide MSFT's PEG (1.77) by the S&P500 PEG(1.76)
-- you get 1.01, meaning you can buy MSFT right
now for a 1% premium to buying the S&P 500 index.
(column 7)

The idea is, the lower that last PE/G number is
in column 7, the more "oversold" the stock is
-- but that's assuming that the company meets
their EPS estimate. And of course, a low number
might just as well be signaling trouble/problems
ahead for the company -- like the current litigation
between MSFT and the DOJ.

A high number suggests an "overbought" condition,
or it could also mean that investors expect earnings
to accelerate or perhaps a buyout is in the rumor
mill. Also, as a rule, the higher the quality of a
stock (consistency in earnings & growth), the higher
the premium will generally be.

It's not a cure-all, but a very good place to start
looking for "value" and entry points.

Stock Price 2000 2001 Growth% PEG vs S&P

A 82 1.33 1.95 20.4% 3.02 1.72
AHAA 70 1.14 1.53 31.7% 1.94 1.10
ADBE 97 2.01 2.39 24.9% 1.94 1.10
AMAT 80 2.14 2.94 23.9% 1.56 0.89
BMCS 39 1.75 2.17 27.1% 0.82 0.47
CSCO 57 0.51 0.66 29.6% 3.78 2.15
CNXT 46 0.87 1.10 25.6% 2.07 1.17
C 58 3.22 3.67 14.1% 1.28 0.73
CTXS 55 0.84 1.09 42.9% 1.53 0.87
CYMI 42 1.48 2.26 31.9% 0.89 0.51
CIEN. 88 0.53 0.96 30.8% 5.39 3.06
EMC 110 1.44 1.90 31.0% 2.46 1.40
GMST 41 0.45 0.54 36.2% 2.52 1.43
HLIT 55 0.99 1.20 37.0% 1.50 0.85
INTC. 110 2.92 3.42 19.9% 1.89 1.08
JDSU. 79 0.37 0.55 46.5% 4.59 2.61
LHSP. 92 1.09 2.10 54.0% 1.56 0.89
MSFT 74 1.68 1.92 24.8% 1.78 1.01
NT. 91 1.31 1.65 20.1% 3.46 1.96
ORCL 63 0.63 0.79 24.8% 4.03 2.29
PPDI 15 1.22 1.49 25.5% 0.48 0.27
QCOM 105 1.05 1.40 35.7% 2.80 1.59
QLGC 62 0.74 0.92 30.6% 2.74 1.56
SEG. 39 0.56 1.29 18.2% 3.83 2.17
VRTS 82 0.49 0.67 47.6% 3.52 2.00
VTSS 54 0.56 0.96 38.9% 2.48 1.41
KOPN. 47 0.45 0.95 45.1% 2.32 1.32
ERICY. 71 0.69 1.19 22.2% 4.64 2.63
SFA. 51 0.76 0.97 22.2% 3.02 1.72
WIND. 29 0.56 0.82 30.4% 1.70 0.97
XLTC 28 1.20 1.40 22.0% 1.06 0.60

Average 2.47 1.40
Median. 2.32 1.32
Cymer 0.89 0.51
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext