Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Manhattan Minerals (MAN.T)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (4106)	4/19/2000 1:33:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) of 4504

<<..I also think the property has merit but the problem>> Glad to see that you now have change your opinion. <<...are probably trapped now as they do not have the resources to execute the path they are on. >> They had $30 millions 6 months ago. I haven't check but they probably still have at least $20M left. That should be enough to reach feasibility on TG-1. No ? Sinking 2-3 holes on an anomaly cost $100-$200K. I think it is wise to do spend $1M that way and find out if any of the 7 best targets have something to help build value. <<When is the resource "big" enough for MAN to develop?>> They are doing it now...and they can't go faster than they are on TG-1.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next