Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elmer who wrote (107184)	4/21/2000 10:17:00 AM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (1) of 1573901

Dear Elmer: Using their competitor AMD as a guide, who went from 5.7M in Q3 to 6M in Q4 and to 6.5M in Q1, Intel should be able to go from 31M in Q3 to 32.6M in Q4 and 35.4M in Q1. They only did 31.8M in Q4 and 31.8M in Q1 from CC. Ramp is what is not good. See previous message. I think it was planned for (They claim it will be fixed in the next quarter (it takes a quarter to produce the fixes in the first mask layers)) but not executed (the planned bin splits are much higher than the actual ones). The first fix was to fix overall yields and the last two were to fix the bin splits. The last two fixes have just not worked well enough. Pete

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next