SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor
GDXJ 121.17-7.0%Feb 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rarebird who wrote (51811)4/21/2000 4:13:00 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) of 116972
 
Rarebird

A lower dollar is important. But my take is that the chief negative for POG is the huge supply of cheap leased gold available from the CBs -- mainly the allegedly "pro-gold" European CBs.

When the shorts can borrow gold at less than 1% and invest the proceeds in riskless T-bills yielding 6%, gold will have a very hard time rallying.

The returns to the CBs from these gold loans are so low that there has got to be a hidden agenda here. Not only that, but these gold loans greatly depress the price the European CBs will receive for the gold they want to sell.

If the CBs were to simply cut the amount of gold available for lease enough to hike lease rates to 3% instead of the current average of around 1%, POG probably would jump 30-40 bucks even if the greenback remained strong.

But the bullion banks would scream bloody murder. And keeping these fat cats growing ever fatter seems to be a key objective of those calling the shots at the CBs.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext