SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific North West Capital Corporation-PFN on Alberta
PFN 7.560+0.5%Nov 11 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Francis R. Biscan Jr. who wrote (1125)4/22/2000 9:26:00 AM
From: Brumell  Read Replies (1) of 2255
 
Good Morning to you Francis,

A discussion of Muskox would be off topic for this thread. They have an extensive web site at: muskoxminerals.com

There also are very good threads both at S.I. and SH. Comments by 1king on S.I. are must reading as is the rebuttal by Victor Lee at S.H. Good stuff. It's a long story but very interesting. To grab the arguments, you'll need to go back a few weeks with posts.

One important point, however. PFN currently has 7 holes reported with acceptable grades and chances for better. They are in an area with existing infrastructure. Muskox is located in Nunavut. They have a reasonable chance of hitting a home run but with their location, it would have to be. Their price also roughly equals PFN's yet they really have nothing substantial at this point.

By comparison, I think PFN is far better value. I'm just surprised Dines didn't mention MSK. It would rate as a better PGM exploration bet than some of his other picks.

Regards,
Bob
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext