SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Catfish who wrote ()4/22/2000 8:51:00 PM
From: jimpit   of 13994
 
_____________________________________________

NewsMax.com
newsmax.com

With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...


Saturday April 22, 2000

Legal Analysts Comment on Raid

Andrew Napolitano, legal analyst for Fox News
and a constitutional scholar had this exchange
today on Fox with Eric Holder, Reno's second in
command at Justice:

Napolitano: Tell me, Mr. Holder, why did you not
get a court order authorizing you to go in and
get the boy?

Holder: Because we didn't need a court order.
INS can do this on its own.

Napolitano: You know that a court order would
have given you the cloak of respectability to
have seized the boy.

Holder: We didn't need an order.

Napolitano: Then why did you ask the 11th
Circuit Court of Appeals for such an order if
you didn't need one?

Holder: [Silence]

Napolitano: The fact is, for the first time in
history, you have taken a child from his
residence at gunpoint to enforce your custody
position, even though you did not have an order
authorizing it.

newsmax.com

All Rights Reserved ¸ NewsMax.com

____________________________________________________
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext