SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology - Fundamentals
STX 286.22+0.3%Dec 26 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mark Madden who wrote (1785)4/22/2000 9:40:00 PM
From: Struggling Investor  Read Replies (1) of 1989
 
Mark, what bothers me is that SEG basically has "carte blanche" to do whatever they want to with the proceeds from the SNDK proceeds (or any other cash on the balance sheets, or indeed, any of SEG's assets,) if I'm interpreting this section of the merger agreement correctly: "all cash on the Seagate balance sheet in excess of $800 million of cash working capital and after giving effect to VERITAS retained cash, debt repayment, taxes and other liabilities." "Other liabilities" sounds like it could be anything, but I'm not a lawyer and am probably becoming slightly (ok - maybe greatly <g>) paranoid, although perhaps with good reason. Someone on the Yahoo board posted that Luczo's ownership in ZOOX merely reflected SEG's, and indeed, the amounts acquired in July were very similar. I did note, however, that it was Luzco, and not SEG, who got a $1M windfall in Feb. from an options' exercise.
As for the $5 add-on, here is an interesting repost:
$5.00?
by: metalmaker5 4/22/00 1:41 pm
Msg: 17518 of 17530
Trish as you can see from the SEC filing the $5 addon is an approximate amount. It could be more or less depending on what SEG management does with the cash position between now and when the deal closes. Many postings indicate that shareholders get $5 for the disk drive biz. You can see by the SEC filing that this is an inaccurate assumption.

Thx for your comments! trish


Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext