Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (78739)	4/23/2000 11:20:00 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) of 108807

You are right. I do NOT understand the intent of quoting stuff I've already read. I've read it, I've come to a different conclusion, I can't read it and understand how you came to YOUR conclusion anymore than I can throw it back at you and have you understand how I came to MY conclusion. It is quoting that is trivial. If I gave you everything I had ever read, if you could study everything I have ever studied, if you took every chemistry, and math class, if you went through every practicum, do you think you would think as I do? I don't think you would. You would still have Neo's wiring. Who knows what conclusion you would come to, but I suspect it would not be the same one as I have come to. So of course I see posting writings that we have all read as pointless. Of course I can't PROVE that, and I know it. In fact I can't prove anything, really. But I know that and I live with that. It doesn't bother me. It doesn't even bother me that you think there is something to be proved. OR that you think you might be proving something. It makes me think you are silly. But does it make you objectively silly? Since for me there is no objective reality of silliness- no.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next