Lemon, your continued lack of honesty is quite disappointing and I would appreciate it if you spare addressing me messages with continual abundance half-truths and misleading interpretations. That you choose to mislead as a response to my posts gives me concern. By all means post on Silicon Investor, but your clear purpose of deception through your fantasy-make-believe-technical representations, is an embarrassment. I understand you have now taken the role of mocking, this is fine, it is a free country, but please understand I have no intention of sending you any further posts. Do as you will, but do not think that you questions will be responded to. The reason why is below.
Though you fake an attempt to address the points I raise, in actuality all you do is use the minutia to attempt to negate the mass of facts that you cannot reject. You are an artist of Posting a self-serving weaving of words of falsehood and general obfuscation to the important points.
Lemon, you present nothing of substance other than what you feel is true. What is clear is that your responses, is that your understanding of technology and your understanding of the XYBR business model, have no relationship together.
There is absolutely no evidence that the industry is moving towards a CORE concept. Without the industry XYBR will fail at this attempt. The premise that these enclosures, which are the form factor of laptops and cellphone and PDAs, will exist is supported by no evidence or acknowledgement of manufactures. Without this support by industry, the concept is dead. The designation of a component sold into the finished goods (ie an OEM component) of another product does not have special patent rights. A wheel on a car is subject to the same patent requirements if it is OEMed to Ford, as it would be if sold directly to consumers.
Other than your own fantasy assessment, show me a substantial statement that industry is moving towards a CORE goal. The CORE is a solution that is looking for a problem that the industry does not see. The CORE is D- or F work by any fair grading system. Can you show that industry is even considering a CORE? NO!
You have been a proponent of XYBR but you do not address the stock price, or the very questionable business model of XYBR that has not turned a profit in the many many years of XYBR operation.
Lemon, until you are ready to post with honesty and candor (something I don't see you capable of), as opposed to these dim and intentionally manipulative posts, I would be appreciate it if you do not post to me. You need to be able to connect what is likely to occur together with the strongest technology to put together a realistic roadmap of the future.
The likeliness drop of XYBR stock from the high 20's to 8 dollars something any informed investor was going to recognize. I think you should be ashamed to have portraying the health of XYBR stock and products. You take no responsibility of having anyone believe that XYBR at 23 dollars was a good investment. Using what skills you may have to this end, is something of your character that I hope few share. I am sure that you will excuse yourself of responsibility, or again tell me of your feelings. Its your deeds, by the way.
Lemon, your continued driveling diatribe remains a warm compost of self-indulgent speeches to yourself. You manipulative rewriting of my words is a disappointment and discredit to you. May you perceive your words to be of wisdom, so that your bloated ego remains fooled. I find you to be a dishonest commentator on technology, with an abundance of obvious word traps and linguistic methods of deceit. What I post is clear, while your recanting of my text is often a manglement of what you know is to be true. I see no purpose to in attempting to redress you false representations. It is clear by you statement, of "having fun" the facts and realistic appraisals are not paramount to your efforts.
goodbye |
