SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU)
LU 2.370-2.5%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: telecomguy who wrote (14500)4/24/2000 7:33:00 AM
From: Mr.Fun  Read Replies (2) of 21876
 
The decision not to emphasize 10Gbps channel speeds was made in late 1996, when it was not so obvious that the market would move to that speed. In fact, LU's largest customers, AT&T at the head of the line (remember this was just past divestiture) told LU NOT to go to the faster speed, but to increase channel count via DWDM. You act as though LU was alone in making this call, but every other major optical vendor aside from NT made the same decision. Where were Alcatel, Siemens, NEC and Ciena with their 10G solutions? By the time it became clear that 10G was a necessity, NT already had a 15 month lead in development. This is likely due to NT's relatively different customer base - WorldCom, Sprint and MCI, none of which bought anything from LU before the acquisition of ASND. QWest, Global Crossing, Level3, Williams, et al. were not much of a consideration in 1996, but you have to give NT the credit for a bold move. Don't act as though it was soooo obvious after the fact.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext