Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin

RMBS 95.57

+0.7%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (40704)	4/25/2000 4:49:00 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) of 93625

Tenchusatsu, Thanks for the reply. On the other hand, I really don't think dual-channel DDR can easily be implemented with just a 6-layer motherboard. That leaves RDRAM with a big advantage once the Willamette/Tehama platform rolls around. Willamette/Foster will at least be able to to use the additional bandwidth offered by Rambus, and dual RDRAM implementations. This still leaves me confused (as I posted earlier) why Intel would prefer DDR to Rambus in the server area, where bandwidth is very important. RDRAM may in fact provide tangible benefits for Willy/Foster, but I am still scratching my head as to why would Intel push it to Coppermine and hedge on Foster. Regarding Athlon, I am not sure if the dual DDR will be necessary. The single channel provides all the bandwidth the (future) Athlon chip is able to receive: 133 MHz x 8 bytes x 2 = 2.1 GB/s. Current Athlons on DDR platform are limited to DDR 200 anyway, with bandwidth of 1.6 GB/s. Which incidentally matches a single RDRAM channel. ;-) Joe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next