SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (17533)4/25/2000 4:34:00 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
"no law ...respecting...prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."

The very amendment that guarantees freedom to exercise religion is now interpreted as a law forbidding it.

Show me where this separation of church and state requires the government to forbid the posting of any religious commandments. It, in fact, prohibits the state from making any law that would restrict the establishment of religion. I know it is popular to interpret this in the reverse. That is, the government must restrict religion in respect of the non religious or other religious, but that is not what the Amendment states. I would oppose a law that requires the posting of religious documents on school walls but not one that gives the school representatives the right to post religious documents. I would go further, to require the state to voucher my kids so that my taxes can go to a school where the Quran's Suras are posted on the walls.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext