SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : E*Trade (NYSE:ET)
ET 16.710.0%Nov 11 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Esway who wrote (13387)4/27/2000 11:00:00 AM
From: SLSUSMA  Read Replies (1) of 13953
 
Had the E-Groupies like BWAC and spytrdr put a little thought into the situation and done some homework, they would have realized that Steve is a founder and insider in the company stock he is talking about. That being said, there are probably reasons why he cannot just sell out of his position and cash out his E*Trade account. Minor things like insider trading, holding periods, etc. You see, for someone who is a master of SEC, FDIC, and SIPC rules, BWAC doesn't consider all the possibilities and doesn't do his homework before casting the first stone. He naturally assumes that any insider can cash out of a $19 million position in a small company stock and suffer ZERO consequences. Steve's explanation that E*Trade might have loaned out the company's stock to short and thus cannot cover is very possible indeed. Imagine the upward pressure those $19 million in shares would generate. Hell, Steven your stock might be worth $40 million!

The same mentality has BWAC supporting E*Trade without doing further research on his own. This is why he failed to see the fall from $35 to $16 that E*Trade suffered.

In the words of Mr. T. - "I pity the fool".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext