SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 90.90-2.0%1:34 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave B who wrote (41041)4/27/2000 12:51:00 PM
From: pompsander  Read Replies (3) of 93625
 
I don't mean this question as sarcasm or a shot..I would like an honest answer:

Won't DDR have the same, or similar, ramping up problems as RDRAM had (has?). Isn't it likely, if not near certain, that architecture of this type, mass-produced for the first time and deployed in cutting-edge hardware configurations will have some rough edges to work out? I seem to feel that many of its advocates believe it will be "plug and play" and I don't know why that would be so. I understand that as a more direct extension of SDRAM it carries some known benefits forward, but isn't DDR a big extension, likely to surprise everyone with some break in headaches? Doesn't mean this hurts the technology long-term, but isn't this a reasonable assumption?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext