Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (108186)	4/28/2000 8:56:00 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) of 1573473

Re: I really don't think AMD's Sledgehammer will be able to compete against Foster in 32-bit performance, nor will it be able to compete against McKinley in 64-bit performance... Against Foster, AMD will be marketing a 64 bit processor against the "old technology" 32 bit Foster at the same price. Against McKinley, AMD's Sledgehammer, unlike the IA-64 dependent McKinley, will execute existing installed code better than than in place equipment demonstrating an immediate across the board performance gain while offering many of the "64 bit" capabilities of McKinley. Will McKinley beat Sledgehammer on optimized code? Quite possibly. Is Esperanto a more efficient language than English? It sure is. Did Esperanto displace English as a language or did the inertia of the "installed base" make English more successful? Both strategies have their strong points, time and relative quality of execution will demonstrate which is the more effective. Regards, Dan PS - What if Sledgehammer beats McKinley on optimized code?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next