Point No.1: The "Tribune" article never states that you did not appear before the court.
Point No.2: You have "opened the door" by drawing attention to your CNBC appearance; therefore answer the following question:
Is the following, as posted in a public venue, true and factual?
By: ettawa
Reply To: 69951 by CrimsThieves Friday, 21 Apr 2000 at 5:50 PM EDT
Post # of 69959
"ACCORDING TO CNBC
crimsthieves was caught with his pants short on safe t lock as well. he went so far as to make contact with the ceo of safe t lock to try and buy shares on the cheep to cover his smelly butt. when told by the ceo to fk off he then had his brokerage conact them to try the same thing. again to no avail. when interviewed by cnbc crimsthieves said he was trying to prove they would sell shares at any price. so crimsthieves what did you prove on that one besides you're an idiot?"
If it is true, then it should remind every ANTS shareholder of the same type of scam that was tried on CHoPP, the predecessor to ANTS, in the late eighties that led to F.B.I. involvement, a multimillion dollar judgment in favor of CHoPP, and the imprisonment of the perpetrators. I believe that they were publishing the Durant Livermore(sp?) newsletter. They were also involved in a scheme to cover their illegal shorting. This is the same newsletter that awarded YOU AND ANTHONY@PACIFIC the "short seller of the year award" for what you did to the price of ANTS in December, 1999. Now, aren't these interesting coincidences? I intend to determine if this is in fact true, and if it is, I also intend to bring it to the attention of the F.B.I., who I am sure will not miss the parallel.
Point No.3: By linking my name with statements about "death threats" on RB, you seem to be implying that I am implicated in any such threats. Is that your contention? Since you seem to follow this board closely (I think that I know why.), I will assume that if you fail to reply that your answer to Point No.3 and the question posed therein is "yes". |
