About that Cuban boy, Elian Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gao seng who wrote (3711)	4/30/2000 1:58:00 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) of 9127

I'm sorry- dead art doesn't = dead? Ok - that's a novel use of the language. So you mean it is very much alive? Or only a bit alive? Or what exactly? Because it seems to me there is a lot of philosophical discussion out there. It seems far from a "dead art" to ME. Thomas Jefferson was NOT using the Bible. Jefferson was a Deist like Washington and Franklin and many of the other framers. I would not say their philosophy was Bible based, or even included the Bible. They certainly had access to, and understood the Bible- the MOST that could be said was that their philosophy did not exclude the Bible per se. I think you are more than dim, I think you have burnt out completely. And for the record I did NOT say the Bible was "better". And I said the Constitution was too young, not too old.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next