SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : DAYTRADING Fundamentals

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: atto who wrote (8138)4/30/2000 5:24:00 AM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) of 18137
 
If I may add my $0.02 to this I think that position size relative to account size is not necessarily a good measure or the definition of risk. Would an account concentrated 100% in BRK.a be more risky than a 'diversified' account of 20 or 30 pink sheet penny stocks? How about an account that is 400% in CSCO for a scalp? This last point is that this is a daytrader's thread, or at least short term oriented so I think we have to assume that folks here know to cut their losses before they become unmanageable. With that assumption, it is the level of loss, not the percentage of the portfolio that is the actual risk. The rest of the argument is pretty basic stuff wrt a short sell being 'more risky' than a long position. With proper position and portfolio management, this is blatantly untrue.

Oh, one thing you guys forgot in your argument is that the short sell deposited money into your account. $10k of the $12k needed to buy back the short resides in your type 5 account. But that's really neither here nor there.

Regards,

Barb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext