It certainly is baloney. Remember Emerald Fields is a private company, so they are not obligated to provide proof or independent confirmation, for anything they say.
The OGS paper is probably the only readily-available report(and certainly the only public document) in existence on the "Big Mack". Why they had to rely on the OGS to do their research work is another open question, as the company's financier, Mr. Bonnycastle, is certainly not poverty-stricken.
They drilled very few holes and, after it became apparent that the "Big Mack" closed off at 65m (demonstrating that there was no size potential), they attempted to bury all the evidence. Fortunately, Fred Breaks disclosed some information on size in the OGS paper, referencing a report by A.Pryslak, an external consultant. We can ask them to post the Pryslak report but I doubt if they will, as it would be rather embarrassing. Why don't you ask Mr. Heatherington to post it?
In any case, the OGS report would answer most of your questions and is a more reliable source of information. |
