SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BarbaraT who wrote (102184)5/3/2000 8:16:00 AM
From: Jack Hartmann  Read Replies (1) of 108040
 
Barbara, RE: WEBM. Revenue for its fiscal-2000 fourth quarter increased more than 350%, to $10.4 million from $2.3 million in the year-ago quarter. Including amortization of deferred stock compensation and accrued dividends related to preferred stock, the net loss was $8.2 million, or 28 cents per share. Without the noncash charges, the net loss was $6.3 million, or 21 cents a share.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000, total revenue increased at an even faster rate, growing more than 410%, to $23 million from $4.5 million in fiscal year 1999. The net loss for the year, excluding amortization of deferred stock compensation, was $16.4 million, or 62 cents a share, compared with the three-analyst estimate of 68 cents.

I see the Market Cap (Mil) $2,710.71 as too high for a company that loses so much money. True the rate of revenue is faster than rate of losses, but $23M in fiscal year revenue doesn't justify such a premium. Tracks exactly like ONDS and has similar losses. The easy money was made by those that bought at $50 for WEBM. I don't see $336 high ever being reached again. So much momentum trading in WEBM that price can swing over 15% easily in a day. I hope you have planned an stop loss price in your mind. Good luck.
I have a field trip with the kids today so will miss the market today.
Jack
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext