SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bert Herman who wrote (109312)5/4/2000 1:28:00 PM
From: Scot  Read Replies (1) of 1579779
 
One filing state FMR as the owner, the other Fidelity.


I think this may explain:

FMR Corp. and Fidelity International Limited are of the view that
they are not acting as a "group" for purposes of Section 13(d) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "1934 Act") and that they are
not otherwise required to attribute to each other the "beneficial
ownership" of securities "beneficially owned" by the other corporation
within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the 1934 Act.
Therefore, they are of the view that the shares held by the other
corporation need not be aggregated for purposes of Section 13(d).
However, FMR Corp. is making this filing on a voluntary basis as if all
of the shares are beneficially owned by FMR Corp. and Fidelity
International Limited on a joint basis.


I think you can view the two filings as a cya for purposes of the 13(d) compliance. Note each filing has a different entity as the filing person (in addition to the controlling FMR shareholders).

-Scot
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext