Libertarian Discussion Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (3567)	5/4/2000 1:54:00 PM
From: Daniel W. Koehler	Read Replies (1) of 13062

Charley <We're talking about a communist dictatorship. What choices does Juan Miguel Gonzalez have down there? The boy is going to a place where he will be a prisoner. Why would a libertarian favor that?> As usual, Chris, a lawyer, looks at libertarian issues as about only about laws and not liberty. Chris is confusing the "live and let live" doctrine as grounds for suffering tyrants. However, the tyrant doesn't care about "living and letting live". Remember appeasement of Hitler?Remember "Detente".? This kind of moral relativism is responsible for much of our woes today. And it is not what libertarianism is about. SO to Chris I say again -Only free people can live and let live. It is a logical impossibility for slave to do it. And, Juan is a slave. Elian doesn't have to be. Ciao, Daniel

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next