SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific North West Capital Corporation-PFN on Alberta
PFN 7.330-0.8%Dec 12 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ptaskmaster who wrote (1510)5/5/2000 3:12:00 PM
From: russet   of 2255
 
<<I'm apparently missing some important mineralogical point here, but can someone enlighten me as to why PFN news releases persist in labeling gold (Au) as a Platinum Group Metal (PGM)? The statement is clear, "PGM (Pt + Pd + Au + Rh)" and so used throughout their news releases.>>

To add to the comments the others made, this question was asked at a convention I attended recently. The answer appears to be mainly because of tradition. South African mining companies were pioneers in PGM exploration and mining development. It was common to include gold in all assays of PGM's in South Africa, perhaps because of the presence of appreciable amounts of gold in the reef deposits there. Everyone has adopted the custom, even though gold content in other deposits is far less.

It certainly serves to inflate values per tonne of ore, but recoveries become the more important consideration.

Edit: I just remembered that the SAf assays were many times called Precious Metal Group assays,...PMG's. Perhaps the industry is confused as well (gggggggggg).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext