Rock Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Rock Resources

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (1868)	5/6/2000 9:00:00 AM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) of 1996

Sample From To......................................... 344260 248.00 250.00 2.00 78 5541 25.0 Well to summarize the whole list, the sample stated above was the "minimum we were looking for. 5541 parts per million is .5541% unless my math escapes right Claude. All the rest of the results are "uneconomical" to say the least. last time I checked nobody bought a 2 metre stretch into production<ggg> So we'll have to see what the RKR geologists think of the area. The greatest difficulty is we have no idea where they drilled on the secondary site anomaly and what the stepouts were, so we have no idea how much of the secondary site they covered. Lastly, I was just told that they stayed on the Carmen Macote section of our property and did not stepout to the adjacent 7 sq km extension....whats up with that?? My impression was that they felt the anomaly extended onto the adjacent 7 sq km's?? So I am not sure where we go from here, but I hope it is to concentrate on Tacho, which, by these results, we should have in the first place! Comments Claude/ the Chief

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next