Excuse me? What are you going on about? You've already said that elitist stuff a thousand times, soon I may take it personally. Timing? Time frame? Odd.
And you never claimed to be an intellectual? What has THAT to do with anything? Are you referring to my description of your gang as "intellectual lowlifes"? If so, there is a misunderstanding here I will be happy to clarify if you want, though it's not important. What a funny misunderstanding!
Well, I can tell you one thing, haqi. You have the distinction of being the first person I have ever met who would come on a public board and brag that they were a member of Mensa! Good God, man.
And I certainly never thought -- or said -- that you had accused me of reporting someone to SI. Why would you accuse me of that? To what purpose? You come up with really strange notions. Hey, I'm tempted to offer another trillion dollar reward! (It's one way of nailing jello to a board.) Haqi, show me where I said you had accused me of reporting someone to SI, you win a trillion dollars!!!
This is the connection in which the question of tattlers to SI was raised:
In your post number 18225, you wrote these words, which I quoted to you in my post number 18317. Bolding mine:
<<<I will be checking on all of the posts, and then
decide what reactions, from me, will be appropriate to get the matter settled. >>>
Now, that might be interpretable -- just might be! -- as having a meaning something along the lines of "I will look through all the posts to see if there's something E said I can rat to SI about and get her kicked off."
It could mean other things (you do like your threats to be "deniable", after all, as has been established); but... it could mean that, couldn't it, haqi?
And I figured, based on experience, that if I pointed that interpretation out here, you would deny that meaning! And would propose, instead, that you meant, by
"checking on all of the posts and then" deciding "what reactions" from you "will be appropriate to get the matter settled," that you meant you were going to decide what to...
say about me.
Yep. Say about me. After checking on all the posts.
(And there are a LOT of them, too! Wow. Quite a lot of research!)
And I do believe you have done just that. Am I correct?: Your "checking on all the posts" has resulted in your "deciding" that the "reactions" that would "be appropriate to get the matter settled" were...
telling "everyone what a snobbish, arrogant fool" I am?
I believe I have that about right. Right?
Good. All is well again, then.
All that is missing is the Chorus. Guys! Where are you! It's Disingenuous Denials Time again!
(Of course you were clued into all this already, having read my Inner Thug post number 18317, which was written to clue you in.)
Yes, haqi, it was a nasty exchange and it should be over. Get your stupid Inner Thug (which, you may have noticed, does not have on me quite the effect you seek) in leash, and it will be.
You wrote:
<<<IOW, you shut up, and I will shut up. That should
be simple enough. ~H~>>>
You've got a deal, haqi.
|
