<<<E, As a mistake you often make in making accusations about me, your words, certainly indicated that it was your last post.>>>
That is an odd statement. I don't suppose by any chance that you would substantiate it? I will give you the usual trillion dollars for the substantiation. I will now substantiate my assertion that that post was not to be my last.
Below are my words. I have omitted only what was repetitive and wonder if you will assert that that is "skullduggery." If so, simply paste the words that say that was my last post. Remember, I will pay you a trillion dollars for it. The oft-offered jello-nailing-reward remains unclaimed. What I said is that I will give you the last word (you being concerned that neither of us gets it) under certain conditions that I have bolded below.
You have not met the conditions. If they are met without an explicit agreement, that will be fine, and the contentiousness will be over. I will, however, be back if characterized unfairly again, and I still have Michael's post to answer. (I went to the links last night, confirmed that Michael's characterization of what happened was inaccurate and prejudicially selective, and I look forward to proving that.)
Michael, perhaps you could PM haqi and confirm that he has misunderstood, if he still doesn't understand after re-reading my words?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I will give you the last word... I will stop posting as soon as you say, maybe at the beginning and end of a post, "This is my last post, and my friends, also, have
promised me that they will stop excavating the subject and making side-references to it and to you."... Edwarda, our ombudsfigure, may "referee"! If a cybersignatory
treacherously breaks the agreement, and she sees it, she will forward the post to me for reply! |
