Much happened around that simple error.
It has been your side's project to reduce PROLIFE's offenses against ethics, and most notably against truth and logic, to the straw man that they consisted of "making a single factual mistake."
That was not the case.
Neocon and others: My husband just said he thinks this exchange is publishable. I agree with him, and we know a great many people in publishing.
If I do the work, simply collecting all the posts, from you, me, haqihana, PROLIFE, JLA, Michael, Lather, and others who may have participated, and assembling them, with no editing whatever, no exclusions, no omissions, is there anyone who would not want them published?
I foresee a problem about venue. I propose to address that this way, if all are "on board." (I won't do the work unless everyone is willing to be included.):
I am willing to give your side, say, six months to seek a venue for publication.
If after that time, you have failed to find a venue for publication, then I'll seek one.
I dare say that any payment would be token, but we could probably agree on a charity to receive it.
I'd be interested in hearing from all the participants. It would be a fascinating read, I think, from many perspectives. |
