Mel and All,
Hi. Been a long time ...
Just wanted to add my 2c worth of thoughts to this page. Not responding to any replies and don't have any answers -- I've been
out the loop for almost a year now.
.50c a share makes me sick and angry at what may be the companies' inability to keep an open line of communication with it's shareholders (last press release December 23rd) and may be it's inability to exploit the media; however, doing my own due diligence, I spoke with Dave Fink a week or so ago, and from what I understand, it was not E-data, but the defendants that called for the 2 month delay. Now, why would the defendants need another 2 months on this potentially "weak patent?" Remember, I think it was Claude Van, who cares what his name is, or Mr. Patent Law himself, Oppendahl's idea for the super fast Markman Hearing. Hmmmm. Extension. Makes ya go Hmmmm, makes you think. Makes their pockets from their client's pocket books go cerchink, cerchink ;-)
Anyway, read the patent for yourself. If you don't believe in it -- by all means : sell your stock get the ^u*& out -- Market Makers are more than happy that this drama is not for the faint-hearted. A Judge does not know nor care about a stock price, does not care about a press release, should be blind to what S/he reads in the paper, and knows only the facts presented. E-data may be suffering from "tunnel vision," but it also appears to be a vision to fight her most important battle on a level playing field where the competitors should be viewed as equals.
"All warfare is based on deception. If you are strong, appear to be weak." --Sun Tzu, The Art of War
I wish you all patience and the best of luck.
Locked in for the verdict,
Adam Grossman |
