Solv Ex (SOLVD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: PRD who wrote (2779)	5/8/1997 5:17:00 PM
From: 993racer	of 6735

If the SEC & SFO visited SOLV, they could have only been "invited." This is because they would need a Candian search warrant to inspect the plant without SOLV'S "invitation." Either way, SOLV did (have to) invite them in. It would look bad for SOLV if they didnt let them in. Why would the SFO show up to investigate the mob/manipulation in trading of SOLV's stock? The SFO was there b/c of one thing PETER YOUNG. In addition, does the SEC comment on these things? The SEC has been investigating SOLV (not the trading) since last March. That is a fact. Im waiting for SOLV's $600 million dollar plan. My personal opinion is that the SEC doesnt want another BreX on their hands (if SOLV is one), so that is all the more reason to pursue all large scale fraud type stocks. In the end, the price speaks for itself. SOLV's news release didnt help any..the stock was at its weakest at 3:52. Good Luck, racer

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next