Right, and I suppose the full-scale, system-wide rollouts in Hawaii, Tampa and (soon to be) San Diego are just "TESTS"??
And I suppose no one else has an offering for a sub-1000 stream server that the MSOs could be using?
And I suppose SEAC (who in fact does offer such a server), is still superior to CCUR (per your earlier claims), despite not being ready in Austin?
And I suppose your earlier post regarding nCUBE's offering of "a single MediaHUB [server that] can deliver 172 simultaneous streams," doesn't apply when it's convenient for it not to?
And I suppose once the MSOs successfully roll all their initial cities out, they are going to switch to an entirely different and (un-"TEST"ed) VOD vendor for all their remaining cities (large and small)?
And I suppose the time, trouble and expense Time Warner went to negotiate a nationwide provider agreement with CCUR was just for fun?
Get real. Open your eyes. And listen to the conference call or talk to management before you open your mouth.
We've had scalability discussions before on this thread - and nothing is changed, except that multiple MSOs are now buying millions of dollars of CCUR servers. Money talks, BS walks. I'll follow the money, thank you.
(PS - This is not to say nCUBE/Diva/SEAC won't get business - they of course will, and that's fine. There will always be competition in any great, growing technology. But your continued disparaging claims regarding CCUR are especially ludicrous this time in light of recent developments - the true facts.)
(PPS - Stock is up since your initial post this morning; thanks!) |
