SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Network Appliance
NTAP 115.69+3.0%1:27 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JRH who wrote (3143)5/10/2000 3:43:00 PM
From: HDC  Read Replies (2) of 10934
 
Justin, Hi! Do you know if NetApp has replied to your friend's company's concerns about their filer versus a SAN? This redundancy issue a come up several times. The SAN guys make this claim in their attempt to unseat NTAP filers because they can't beat them in head-to-head performance. It was addressed in one of NTAP's technical papers titled "Enterprise Storage: System and Data Availability" and can be found in the technical library of their website. It's a good read and very informative.

Many companies are using a combination of NAS and SAN for their websites. They are using a SAN for the database and OLTP (on-line transaction processing) and a NAS NTAP filer on the front end to handle the graphics and file portions of their web pages. A filer will certainly ease the burden on the SAN because the mundane file and graphic info requests will be handled by the filer. This will free the servers in front of the SAN to handle OLTP. Something to think about.

Best,

Duncan
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext