SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 478.53-1.0%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ProDeath who wrote (44629)5/11/2000 1:13:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
You say The poor reliability and erratic behavior of MS desktop software makes it expensive to support as well as infuriating and antagonistic to many end users.

And that would be in comparison to what desktop software? I'm really curious. While the Mainframe terminals like the 3280 were pretty trouble free, likewise the VT100 and its descendents, there were few tears shed when they were replaced by PCs. Unix workstations may have some advantages in a few situations (trading desks being one that I am familiar with), but NT based workstations now have similar capability for those uses, and also are at least as reliable and non-erratic, and as a result are rapidly replacing Unix boxes in many of those situations.

Aside from that, your statement seems pretty abstract. More erratic than what? Less reliable than what?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext