SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.730-0.7%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tero kuittinen who wrote (4739)5/12/2000 10:24:00 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (1) of 34857
 
If it was on the QCOM boards, I would've missed it. You mean this?
To: Ramsey Su who started this subject
From: carranza2 Tuesday, May 9, 2000 4:58 PM ET
Reply # of 10010

Please find below a message from Yahoo! AWE thread which was repeated on the Rocket board. I think it says that the costs of implementing EDGE via TDMA are considerably less than 3G through CDMA/HDR. Perhaps the tech-brains in residence on this Board are able to dissect the arguments made. I certainly can't as I'm simply not sufficiently knowledgeable. Not stupid, just ignorant <g>.
POST FROM THE AWE BOARD
messages.yahoo.com. 54335&mid=197
=====================================
CDMA VS. TDMA- FACTS not opinion
by: mr_investor_2000 (M/Las Vegas,NV.) 5/9/00 12:11 pm
Msg: 197 of 226
Again, this is hype of CDMA-HDR (QCOM) over TDMA/EDGE-1XTREME (MOT). Are you aware of Guilder's extensive CDMA holdings? As for timeliness, it will take 2-4 yrs for each tech to be deployed. Given that coverage for a fixed area requires more CDMA sites than TDMA would, negotiating all those tower rights with the recently consolidated tower sector should effectively cost more for CDMA. It further stands to reason that TDMA gear will occupy more cage space than CDMA to meet node capacity, but CLEARLY the cost metrics for deployment are in the TDMA camp. After all, TDMA EDGE is being developed by more than one patent holder. So, your argument of slow growth due to deployment delays is actually more impacting to CDMA. You must have been an English major to rewrite the truth as you did.

Again, "utilized at any interesting level" requires human interfaces that enable one to do so, AND if and only if, there are mature applications available to the user ALL AT A REASONABLE COST.

The network congestion you speak of is an issue resolved. For uninformed English majors such as yourself, when AT&T offered its Personal Communications package and Digital One Rate programs, it grabbed market share beyond its capacity. Do you think that lesson is lost? If so, maintain your ignorance.

"I think the modulation is too narrowband", and what do you think DSSS does under CDMA?!? How many discrete freqs does CDMA possibly use and reuse within a transmission? And you talk about TDMA being narrowband! So tell us genius, under HDR what happens in CDMA when a reused channel within the sequence NACK's? (Tell us this never happens.)
Nice try at the use of a little techno-speak. You and the ratsass are regurgitators, the remains of which lose their original flavor and show yourselves as shorts.

As for NTT, ask them yourself. It could be that Fujitsu couldn't do the job right the first time, and it will be adding corrected I-mode gear when it is produced.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext