SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.835-1.1%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ruffian who wrote (4795)5/13/2000 1:16:00 AM
From: postyle  Read Replies (2) of 34857
 
The "newduo" is all aware of the games that are being played.

And it's the same royalty, whether they sell products for CDMAone, whether they sell the products for MC CDMA, or whether they sell it for DS CDMA.

Same royalty rate, sure. The problem that exists for them, is that when the same royalty rate is applied to both CDMA2000 and W-CDMA, you get two different numbers. Because the amount of essential IPR that they have in WCDMA is not even comparable to their standing with CDMA2000.

So, then the response would be (of course) "It doesn't matter if only one CDMA patent is infringed, because QCOM will charge on the whole patent portfolio."

To which I would answer, what infringement? IDCC claims they can get around it.

postyle

p.s. Did I mention that IDCC claims they will receive royalties on all CDMA2000 handsets (bi-modal or not)? And HDR as well?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News