Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 34.61

+0.8%

9:45 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: greenspirit who wrote (103383)	5/13/2000 1:47:00 AM
From: carl a. mehr	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Michael, I usually agree with your posts and have enjoyed them over the years, but here we differ. On Part 1. Putting Amy J. in charge I agree with you. On Part 2. I completely disagree with you. <<The trial court granted Intel's request and permanently enjoined Hamidi from sending e-mail to Intel employees at their work e-mail address. There was no request or order that would have prevented Hamidi from having communication with Intel employees at their private e-mail addresses. >> The second half of the above statement gives the proper place for this disgruntled former Intel employee to send his e-mail. The following is a great site for all the misfits that did not 'cut the mustard' at Intel faceintel.com Intel is a great company that knows the value of terminating employees that can be classified as misfits or deadwood. (You must meet very high standards to be an Intel employee). Intel is handling the situation just fine. Hamidi should get a life...humble carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next