Tero it doesnt change the fact that you have made broad assumptions that are completly wrong. I have no problem with someone being incorrect, we are all human. Clark and myself have as he pointed out, also have been wrong. However we were able to realize we were wrong and go forward. In your incorrect analysis, to my recolection,you have never heard you say "hey I was wrong it looks like Ericy didnt invent CDMA". This is where your opinion troubles me. Its like the NYT times printing something absolutly untrue, and when directed to that fact, they redirect attention elsewhere(kindalike what you just did with that last post). There are many here who value your opinion VERY highly, and that is an extreme responsibility. I think having that responcibility should prod you into being a litlle more objective. The spin on anything towerds Q is always Negative and Pro-NOK it is not objective, or correct. I would hope it was your pasion that made you so one sided and not an Envelope with a paycheck. I dont know, I do know in the past I have gotten along very well and think highly of your opinion. I, however think people who are taking your opinion so seriously should get an idea of your extreme bias and how its swayed your past opinions(for whatever motive). I treated Gregg powers no differently, frequently being taken to task by SI threadmates for being to critical. His bias also blinded him in certain areas. As for my identity, that is pretty irrelevent and a form of rhetorical denial of the value of my opinion. A cheap technique for silencing me at best. As for my credibility, anyone here not on SI for the last 3 years please read my posts, and the acuracy of PRO and CON on Qcom and determine for themselves if who I am is relevent. I have a clear consiounce of what i have said, and
its acuracy and intelectuall honesty.
Regards Jason |
