SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Do handguns serve a purpose other than killing people?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Gordon A. Langston who wrote (277)5/14/2000 6:12:00 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III  Read Replies (1) of 289
 
You make some good counter arguments but to be realistic, other than the political fallout, what group armed with fully automatic weapons is going to have a snowballs chance in a second civil war? Waco would be nothing if some militia group decided to proclaim the "untited States of Texas" and try to succeed by force. I would simply be launching out a 6 ship of B-52s and 1 hour later there would be a crater where the group used to be. I know I am over stating the point but I am just trying to make the point as clear as possible.

The civil war was before M-1 tanks, Apache Helicopters, Heavy bombers etc. What chance would a private army have against today's modern military or is the NRA going to claim they need tanks too? <ggg>

If I were a jew in Warsaw, I would not want a .25 cal, I would want a .45, 10 Mag or What I own personally now, my own Desert Eagle (Yes I know it is considered an assault weapon because it weighs too much and is semi auto and small) Defence requires quick effecient knock down, not a .25 cal that allows the other guy to squeeze off a few rounds after being hit.

Good Luck and trade safe this week, it should be interesting,

Lee
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext