SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Wit Capital - The way of the future?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Joe Lamantia who wrote ()5/15/2000 5:45:00 PM
From: Topannuity  Read Replies (2) of 16809
 
TheStreet.com sez:

Wit and E*Trade to Swap Some Struggling Ventures
By Caroline Humer
Senior Writer
5/15/00 4:34 PM ET

Sometimes two wrongs can make a right.

The plan from E*Trade (EGRP:Nasdaq) and Wit Capital (WITC:Nasdaq) to play switcheroo with
their investment banking and brokerage businesses should leave both companies better off.

E*Offering, the West Coast investment bank in which E*Trade holds a 28% stake, will be merged
into Wit Soundview, the investment-banking unit of Wit. Wit puts 32 million shares, or $356 million,
into the new venture. E*Trade will buy 2 million Wit shares and, in return, get Wit's tiny
retail-brokerage business.

The deal enables Wit to shed an online-brokerage business that couldn't catch up to the bigger
players, and E*Trade to escape its piece of a struggling online investment bank.

Both firms tried to grow large enough to position themselves to both underwrite and distribute initial
public offerings as clients clamored for pieces of the highflying deals. A cooled IPO market and
competition from other electronic and traditional competitors such as Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
(MWD:NYSE) and Merrill Lynch (MER:NYSE), though, have made each firm's road more difficult.

Wit was the first brokerage to bring IPOs to retail investors in the late 1990s as the online-trading
craze took off. In late 1998, E*Trade launched its own investment bank, E*Offering, and started
distributing hot IPOs underwritten by it and investment banks such as Robertson Stephens, now a
unit of FleetBoston Financial (FBF:NYSE).

"I think both of these guys have been trying to stumble about for their place in this world," says
Steve Franco, an analyst with US Bancorp Piper Jaffray, adding that E*Offering and Wit were often
going head-to-head for pieces of the same deal.

"It was always either or, Wit or E*Offering, on a deal. Just by the nature of that merger, they're going
to expand the list of potential deals by two," Franco said. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray hasn't done any
underwriting for the firms, has a strong buy on E*Trade and no rating on Wit.

The online-banking ranks are now down to FBR.com, W.R. Hambrecht and Epoch Capitol, the
investment-bank venture involving Charles Schwab (SCH:NYSE) and Ameritrade (AMTD:Nasdaq).

"It highlights the potential for further consolidation. It could be the start of more of this because of
current valuations and the need for scale," says Richard Repetto, an analyst at Lehman Brothers,
which hasn't done underwriting for either company and has an outperform rating on E*Trade.

Those Online Banking Blues
By folding E*Offering into Wit, E*Trade and other investors such as venture capitalist General
Atlantic Partners -- which had stakes in both E*Offering and E*Trade -- have managed to cash in on
a previously money-losing unit. (E*Offering plans to book its first profit this year.)

E*Trade will own less than 10% of the combined Wit-E*Offering after the deal. It's also successfully
cured its increasingly public headache with E*Offering, formed in 1999 by E*Trade, former
Robertson Stephens' head Sandy Robertson and venture capitalists including General Atlantic.

Run by Walter Cruttenden III, the company's Newport Beach stride never seemed to fit E*Trade's
Silicon Valley mold. Rumbles of trouble began last summer when high-profile analyst Gary Craft
walked and ads for a chief executive officer ran week after week in the back of the Industry Standard.

Even talk of E*Offering's own IPO plans rankled some and sparked a competing tale that had
E*Trade increasing its stake in the company. Cruttenden was replaced by E*Trade's Steve King as
interim chief executive, and while its deal flow continued, no lucrative lead-manager assignments
followed.

At E*Trade, its rapidly expanding customer base was clamoring for more IPOs and research.
Through E*Offering and an agreement with Robbie Stephens, E*Trade tried to meet investors'
insatiable demands for access to more IPOs.

Retail Malaise
Wit, despite acquiring private investment bank Soundview, is suffering from a similar problem with
its retail business. In the first quarter, the number of shares distributed to online investors dropped
as allocations shrunk and the ratio of follow-on offerings increased, feeding instead the appetite of
Soundview's institutional customers.

Wit's retail account base grew, but at about 100,000 is still a fraction of E*Trade's 2.6 million.
Customers complained about service and plans for an after-hours trading network -- part of founder
Andrew Klein's dream to bring Wall Street to the little people -- were permanently shelved.

Those days are clearly in the past.

E*Trade expects to end up with 70,000 to 80,000 new accounts from Wit, E*Trade Chief Executive
Christos Cotsakos said during a conference call in which analysts, but not journalists, were allowed
to ask questions.

The balance of the accounts are expected to be overlaps, because many IPO-seekers tried to
increase their odds by holding both E*Trade and Wit accounts. Financially, the deal will help, too.
E*Trade will book a $50 million gain on the sale of much of its E*Offering stake during the third
quarter.

Wit's gains, meanwhile, in addition to expectations for more earnings, will be an exclusive hold on
E*Trade's rapidly growing distribution network (and vice versa) for the next five years.

If only the IPO market could hold up that long.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext