SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mani1 who wrote (111225)5/16/2000 11:51:00 PM
From: Goutam  Read Replies (4) of 1573039
 
Mani,

< I do have a nice collection by Yousef bookmarked at home about the 266 MHz Athlon and no AMD CPU passed 300 MHz on 0.25. He is the process expert, you know. >

I book-marked your post containing links to Yousef's FUD -

Here is the link and the content:
___________________________________________________________________
Message 11445732

Yousef Re <<Reading Made Simple...Jimmy, you and Kevin have a "comprehension" problem or "craps" for brains. <ggg>>>

OK big shot, here is reading assignment for you. Take a look at these quotes, all made by you,

"We might see 266mhz and 300mhz K7's." <ggg>

Message 5270460

"How fast do you expect the K7 in .25um to run ... maybe 300mhz or 350mhz ?? I expect that Intel processors will be 500+mhz in .25um and 600+mhz in .18um when AMD releases the K7."

Message 5270530

"AMD will need a .18um process just to get to 450mhz ... Same old story for AMD"

Message 5503842

There are many more if one is willing to take the time. I think 3 is good enough for now.

Now Yousef, I am sure you are going to post another stupid and arrogant comment followed by <ggg>. But keep in mind that you are making a complete clown of yourself. I am so tired of your disrespectful and arrogant responses (I don't think that I am the only one) that I actually took the time to look up the BS you continue to post.

I think I am going to book-mark this post (don't want to look up the links again) since I am sure you will need to get reminded of your "expertise".

Now excuse me if I am not running for the sell door as soon as you predict there will be problem with the Copper process.

Mani

___________________________________________________________________

If one traces Yousef's first post's message chain backwards, you will see this classic from Paul Engel -

Message 5266381

To: John Petzinger who wrote (34909)
From: Paul Engel
Tuesday, Jul 21, 1998 4:11 PM ET
Reply # of 111245

Petz - AMD delays K7 until LATE 1999

{====================================}

"AMD said it will port its upcoming K7 processor to a
0.18-micron process and aluminum interconnects in the fourth quarter 1999, switching to copper in 2000 at its fab in Dresden, Germany. "

pubs.cmpnet.com

{===================================}

Paul

There were 4 replies to this post fending off Paul's FUD

Goutama
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News