Computer Learning Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Computer Learning

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: PMS Witch who wrote (9704)	5/17/2000 1:28:00 PM
From: mr.mark	Read Replies (1) of 110645

hi pw, when i use the .bat file you've posted, i get uneven results. initially it appears that all temp int files are deleted. however, they reappear again moments later upon reopening explorer. i made note of the fact that after running your .bat file there were six cookie files remaining in the temp int file in explorer. i then opened norton's cleansweep and discovered 31 cookies waiting to be cleaned. i swept them all away. went back to explorer and there were the same six cookies from previously. at this point i clicked edit, select all, delete and they finally disappeared. so my 'field tests' lead me to these conclusions.... 1) the .bat file misses an awful lot of cookies. 2) norton cleansweep is more thorough. 3) sometimes more than one method must be employed to achieve desired results. the .bat file does its job admirably for removal of temp files and most temp int files, and for erasing the swap file. thoughts? :) mark

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next