SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : INVT - Investamerica, Inc.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Seer who wrote (165)5/18/2000 3:23:00 PM
From: DizzyG  Read Replies (1) of 214
 
Oh, Seer...

let's get some action going on this board again.

Well, Seer, you've got me interested. Would you care to explain this post:

By: SEER
Reply To: None Wednesday, 17 May 2000 at 11:51 PM EDT
Post # of 62497

An "unofficial investor relations" team used an informational website and a phoneline to hype invt. They never leaked information but with only hinting they pumped it up. Legal? yes. They've now stepped aside and are leaving it to the Vancouver group. Our connection to the company is about to get more direct, and OFFICIAL.
I have spoken with Ian and Brian many times. Ian was sincere but (I believe) he was working for himself, not the company. He has no official position with Optica. He is a fellow shareholder. Brian is the same; IMO not really contributing to the BOD but just circumstantially on the board. They're very smart men and have done a fantastic job. Without them Optica would have never gotten to where it is today. On the otc/bb!! I am still expecting to have my other "sock blown off" by the next nice ride. I lost one around $10-11 on that first run and want to go barefoot by summer, june 20.

ragingbull.com

BTW, if the "unofficial investor relations" team was selling into the rally, I'm sure the SEC would be interested. Legal? No! What they did is called front running and the SEC doesn't look to kindly on the practice...

Diz-
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext