The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The New Qualcomm - write what you like thread.

QCOM 170.90

-1.3%

Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric L who wrote (1715)	5/22/2000 1:06:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (2) of 12231

Eric, I've never used 'ignore' until recently and I don't like it. I nearly missed an excellent Jon Koplik post because he was replying to somebody I had on ignore. It would be far better for people to simply adopt the tone of the discussion and contribute on that basis and be self-disciplining. Many have stuck in their head the slogan "I have an inalienable right to free speech", completely missing the point that they don't have it at other people's expense or in other people's places and they sure don't have the right to inflict it on anyone. They are letting a slogan do their thinking for them. They should instead operate on my favourite slogan "Don't let a slogan do your thinking for you". [Sorry to bore those who have seen that so many times]. The point of the right to free speech is that people have the right to express. Others of course have the right to not listen, or ignore, or exclude that expression from their premises or property, and SI is a property owned by SI, which they delegate control of to moderators in the new system. Nobody [in the USA free speech context but don't try this in public or at home in Malaysia or most other places] can stop others expressing themselves in their own medium. But people do NOT have the right to take possession of somebody else's medium and demand the right to free speech. Apart from being outright rude, obnoxious, bad-mannered etc, it completely misses the point of free speech. Eric, I'm meaning this generally of course, not lecturing you. This is in the hope that some people who are too keen to ignore requests to keep in to Ramsey's style get to understand another way of looking at the right to free speech. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next