SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Robert Rose who wrote (480)5/22/2000 7:38:00 PM
From: 16yearcycle  Read Replies (1) of 57684
 
Ok: when should you have lightened up and where would you be at if you did? And be honest with yourself: how much would you have lost getting out early, and gained by being out in the drop, and then when would you get back in? That's 3 decisions instead of one. I was up 21x last year and 80x from 10/9/1998 until 4/3/00. My compounding return was 91% per year for the 13 years until April. I have gone back and ran numbers with the idea that I would use peg ratio's as my indicatotions for the above maneuvers, and sell and buy based on those measures.(someone said here that peg's are a "new economy" creation, and they may be defined that way but going back forever, companies tend to sell at or above a peg of 1 and leaders at 2.)The leaders shot by peg's of 2 in early Decemnber, so I would have sold in early Dec, but I would have bought back at about nasdaq 3700. By doing this I would be almost exactly where I am now, at Dec 6 levels.

FWIW, I am down about 50% from my peak. But this still puts me at more than 400% higher than 1 year ago.

The point is that we need to see whether a 100% new economy allocation is wrong or not. Aren't we still far better off for having been aggressive?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext