SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : IMMM ( I'm Mad Monk)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Westley who wrote (664)5/9/1997 10:32:00 PM
From: SOROS   of 1480
 
Paul,

Could you and any others (although I suspect we are dealing with only one individual here) take this personal CSGI garbage to that thread only? This thread is for IMMM. If you don't like the stock, sell and get out. If you bought in the .30's, your loss is not that great.

For clarification, I only know Mad Monk through this forum. I struck up a certain affinity for him because he seemed capable of the mental challenge. If you will read the post that started this thread, you will stop this "scam" garbage leveled at myself and Mad Monk. Anyone who has read our posts know the styles in which we write. Everyone of intelligence on these threads has a certain style. You can quickly separate the "facts" from the "entertainment". The between the lines stuff is sometimes a little harder to decipher, but that is what gentlemen like Mad Monk finds entertaining at times. For you to suddenly pop up here because of a personal riff on another stock and start threatening "SEC" violations that are total crap is disgustingly appauling to this poster. My view of IMMM, and I believe Mad Monk's, has been clearly stated. It is a very speculative stock. I have called it a gamble. I do have a very good feeling about it or I certainly would not have purchased stock at $1.10 or at .18 either, both of which I have done. I was just as shocked (for lack of a better word) when the price fell today. It has behaved in a most unusual manner, but it has been none of my doing. I have done nothing but purchase more stock -- sometimes at the expense of my logical facilities, but then, as I have said on more than one occasion, I can't see UPR, no matter if they have no monetary risks (there are perception risks), taking part in a "scam". I may be a "fool" in the end, but I will have been an honest "fool" -- but I hope to be a rich "fool". You, sir, and I use that term loosely, should watch very carefully where you throw accusing remarks. I have no quarrel with you. If you have differences with Mad Monk on CSGI, take it there. Don't bring false accusations to this thread simply because Mad Monk happens to have put some of his money in IMMM stock. Your CSGI differences and what is happening with IMMM are totally unrelated.

I, too, would like to hear Franz Offey's (SP?) of Portfolio group explanation of what she thinks is going on with the bouncing around of this stock? I can't figure it out, but this fidgity action alone has not persuaded me that IMMM is purporting something dishonest. If I am wrong, the monetary loss will hurt, but I have always told others to make their own decisions and base nothing they do on what I say. The "fake" press release is self-explanatory, and I welcome anyone to show even a smidgeon of manipulation tactics in this post.

I apologize to all on this thread for this long post, but if there are anymore of these false accusations thrown my way, I will begin to contact those that need it.

After these last few days, I do feel like I'm watching the roulette wheel and shouting "come on black" -- in more way than one.

I remain,

SOROS
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext